Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I’m conflicted about this. Time used for what might be speech-making
> from one person, could be a more nuanced point from another. We keep
> saying we need to use our f2f time more efficiently. Well, sometimes
> that means breadth and a lot of people providing quick input and it
> also can mean depth and giving folks enough time to say something
> clearly. I think hard and fast rules like fixed time limits will
> prevent the latter (from both ends of the room).
Maybe we need "+1" paddles people can raise.
Or people could be asked humm if they agree or disagree.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
