On 30/5/19 20:10, Michael StJohns wrote: > On 5/29/2019 9:06 PM, NomCom Chair 2019 wrote: >> >> As a member of the NomCom it is very important that you be able to >> attend IETF 106 (Singapore) to conduct interviews. Being at IETF 105 >> (Montreal) is useful for orientation. Being at IETF 107 (Vancouver) >> is not essential. >> > We probably need to try to have the 3rd meeting of the year rotate > among Asia, Europe and North America to make Nomcom a bit more evenly > accessible. Singapore will be 5 in a row for Asia. Before that it was 3 > for NA, 3 for Asia and then a very long string of NA locations. If attendance to meetings are mandatory, why not make them a formal requirement? (*) Otherwise, this gets tricky for nomcom members, since you are required to do something that's not formally a requirement. And becausethis is not formally a requirement, it may be also harder to get funding for nomcom member to attend such meetings. OTOH, if they are not a formal requirement, why not mae remote participation tools do the trick? (*) By no means I'm proposing that this becomes a requirement. Actually, quite the opposite. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
