I'm not on any kind of I*, but when I was, the idea behind an IAB shepherd was not that primarily that they provided a review but that they helped the proponents of the work navigate the IETF process (especially the BOF process) and get to a crisp problem statement, etc. I never thought of it as a requirement, but rather something that was intended to result in a more productive discussion.
-Ekr
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:21 AM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear IAB,
I assume that the IAB has received a briefing about
draft-moonesamy-recall-rev [1] as it was discussed at the IESG
Retreat. If I am not mistaken, an IAB shepherd can provide a review
of architectural consistency and integrity. Does the short draft [1]
require that type of review?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-recall-rev-02
