On 5/9/19 5:14 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
Fine plan, except that it would deceive the reader about the state of the (new) specification and would violate our long-standing rule against publishing standards-track specifications that contain known technical defects.
That's why section 3.3 is, in my opinion, critical. Maybe not in its current formulation, but (IMHO) something along those lines is necessary to make this work even a little bit.
/a
