Re: [arch-d] deprecating Postel's principle- considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In article <53a9c16c-163c-a18a-371a-f8aa8697af15@xxxxxxxxx> you write:
>Question for ya on that Barry - do you think that MUA
>and mail server implementers would actually bounce
>messages as strictly as Martin's document might call
>for?

I'm not Barry but I can say that increasingly we do.  We observe
that spamware is badly written, and there are mechanical errors
that are strong indicators that the sender is not someone you want
to hear from.

A common spamware error is "early talking", sending SMTP commands
before the server's initial banner.  If you wait a few seconds before
sending the banner, and hang up on anyone who sends a command first,
you'll lose a lot of spam at low cost.

Another is greylisting, deliberately soft-failing a new sender and
seeing if it retries, since spamware generally won't.

There's another whole can of worms about what to do with mail that
doesn't validate under SPF, DKIM, or DMARC but let's not go there now.

R's,
John




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux