The proposed alternative I thought I saw was to
a) establish a mailing list (because we do not like holding discussions
of specific documents on the IETF list)
b) hold some explicit virtual sessions to discuss the draft
Given how small and focused the draft is, creating a working group seems
rather odd.
Making even small process changes in the IETF is hard. The handling of
this seems designed to make it even harder. Note: I do not believe that
is the actual intent of the responders. It is however the apparent result.
Yours,
Joel
On 4/24/19 6:53 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
It doesn't make sense to ask a person who lacks extensive travel
resources to fly to Canada to hold a BoF about a short draft.
I understand the situation, and having been in that place for years, am empathetic.
But the proposed alternative seems to be "take my draft as-is"
