On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 09:29:35PM +0000, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: > Hi Aanchal, > > Thanks for the review. Please see inline. > > On 2019-04-11, 5:54 PM, "netconf on behalf of Aanchal Malhotra via Datatracker" <netconf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Aanchal Malhotra > Review result: Ready > > The document is very clear and concise. I just have one minor clarification question. > Section 3.4 Page 9 that says the following: > "In addition to any required ........SHOULD only be allowed......". > > Is there a reason for using SHOULD instead of MUST? > > There may be reasons why an implementation decides not to enforce this restriction. Going by RFC2119 definitions, this is why we chose SHOULD instead of MUST. If you have some reasons in mind, it is often helpful to list them as examples of when the recommended behavior would not be followed. Thank you Aanchal for the review! -Ben
