Hi Aanchal,
Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
On 2019-04-11, 5:54 PM, "netconf on behalf of Aanchal Malhotra via Datatracker" <netconf-bounces@xxxxxxxx on behalf of noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Aanchal Malhotra
Review result: Ready
The document is very clear and concise. I just have one minor clarification question.
Section 3.4 Page 9 that says the following:
"In addition to any required ........SHOULD only be allowed......".
Is there a reason for using SHOULD instead of MUST?
There may be reasons why an implementation decides not to enforce this restriction. Going by RFC2119 definitions, this is why we chose SHOULD instead of MUST.
3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
Regards,
Reshad.
_______________________________________________
netconf mailing list
netconf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
