Hi Robert,
Thank you for the review, please see inline.
On 2019-04-10, 12:17 PM, "Robert Sparks via Datatracker" <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-notif-13
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2019-04-10
IETF LC End Date: 2019-04-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: Ready for publication as a proposed standard
Nits/editorial comments:
The abstract is quite terse. Please consider expanding it to something that
stands better by itself.
TBH I'm not sure what else to add. I'll discuss with the other authors.
The sentence that starts "Driving these requirements" in the introduction does
not follow where it sits in the paragraph. There is no antecedent for "these
requirements". I suggest replacing the sentence with "Requirements for these
mechanisms are captured in [RFC7923].
Makes sense, I'll make the change.
The second sentence in the first paragraph of section 3 is a run-on. I suggest
s/2.4, the/2.4. The/
Sure.
Regards,
Reshad.
