[...]
I actually don't know if "this ipv6-over-80211ocb spec needs to rely on the use of a non-0 value in the intermediate 54 bits", btw. If that's not the case, it's much safer and less controversial to just not mention it (either in the form of "LL prefix length" or more explicitly). I guess that's also what others are suggesting (and I agree with them in that sense).
There is the option of being silent about the prefix length of IPv6 LLs in the IPv6-over-OCB document. There is the option of mentioning "fe80::/10", but with "Updates 4291 section X" in the header of the 1st page. There is the option of proving by implementation that fe80:1::1/32 on OCB is not harmful to others. Alex
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
