Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mar 18, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, Dan.  Thanks for the review, and I’m sorry you didn’t get a response to your question before.

Indeed, this document got moved to a later telechat and in the midst of that I failed to thank you for your reviews, Dan. I entered a Yes ballot. IANA had been tracking this for some time so I believe the instructions are clear. 

Alissa


Last part first: IANA does not normally make changes until the document is approved, and this is not an exception.

The changes to the derived property values are described in detail in the text in Section 3.  The designated expert will need to check all that and generate a list of specific chaanges to the table here:

...and IANA will then apply those changes.

Barry

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:31 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 2019-03-18
IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

This document is Ready. However, I have signaled one minor issue in my LC
review which was not addressed in the revision, neither have I seen an answer
to the clarification that I requested (unless I missed some mail).

Major issues:

Minor issues:

(from my previous review, not addressed)

The IANA Considerations text is not clear to me.

> IANA is requested to update the IDNA Parameters registry of derived
   property values, after the expert reviewer validates that the derived
   property values are calculated correctly.

What does this exactly say? Are these recommendations for future actions, or do
they refer specifically to property values described in this document? Are the
expert reviewer validation and IDNA Parameters registry update required to be
performed prior to approval of this document?

Nits/editorial comments:


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux