Hi Barry,
Thank you for the clarification. Probably adding something like ('... as detailed in Section 3') would have helped to make clear the scope of what is referred to in the IANA Considerations section.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:43 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(And I was still not sufficiently clear...)
The list for the expert to check is in the appendices.
Barry
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:31 AM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Dan. Thanks for the review, and I’m sorry you didn’t get a response to your question before.
>
> Last part first: IANA does not normally make changes until the document is approved, and this is not an exception.
>
> The changes to the derived property values are described in detail in the text in Section 3. The designated expert will need to check all that and generate a list of specific chaanges to the table here:
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/idna-tables-6.3.0/#idna-tables-properties
>
> ...and IANA will then apply those changes.
>
> Barry
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 3:31 AM Dan Romascanu via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review result: Ready with Issues
>>
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
>> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>>
>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>
>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>
>> Document: draft-faltstrom-unicode11-08
>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
>> Review Date: 2019-03-18
>> IETF LC End Date: 2019-03-05
>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>>
>> Summary:
>>
>> This document is Ready. However, I have signaled one minor issue in my LC
>> review which was not addressed in the revision, neither have I seen an answer
>> to the clarification that I requested (unless I missed some mail).
>>
>> Major issues:
>>
>> Minor issues:
>>
>> (from my previous review, not addressed)
>>
>> The IANA Considerations text is not clear to me.
>>
>> > IANA is requested to update the IDNA Parameters registry of derived
>> property values, after the expert reviewer validates that the derived
>> property values are calculated correctly.
>>
>> What does this exactly say? Are these recommendations for future actions, or do
>> they refer specifically to property values described in this document? Are the
>> expert reviewer validation and IDNA Parameters registry update required to be
>> performed prior to approval of this document?
>>
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>>
>>
