Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07.txt> (Consolidated IASA 2.0 Updates of IETF Administrative Terminology) to Best Current Practice
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Jason Livingood <Jason_Livingood@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07.txt> (Consolidated IASA 2.0 Updates of IETF Administrative Terminology) to Best Current Practice
- From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:24:25 -0700
- In-reply-to: <64D8D6A524341DA1A12CAF16@PSB>
- References: <155233988598.23126.17393958685508352412.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190314044333.0ba709b8@elandnews.com> <64D8D6A524341DA1A12CAF16@PSB>
Hi Jason, Jon,
Please see the message at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x4vWrIVJ172DjD-3sb-R_1jUHFY
Could the IASA20 working group please provide a response to the
Last-Call comments?
Adding to my previous comments, the "Executive Director" title would
create some confusion as the person holding the position is not a
director of the LLC Board. The title of "Managing Director" does not
make the distinction between Managing Director and LLC Director clear.
From what I understand the draft updates RFC 6072 because of a title
which comes from the reference in RFC 6072 to an obsoleted RFC
(3979). Why does RFC 6072 have to be updated by this (intended) BCP
when it is not even part of the "Note Well"?
I took a quick look at some of the other BCPs related to the
IETF. One of them states that "there is no board of directors for
the IETF". That definition is likely "historic".
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]