Tony Finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If someone says "let's put this config data in DNS" and someone responds
>> "DNS is too difficult to manage", the answer isn't necessarily "let's
>> invent a new protocol".
> This is outside the areas I am familiar with, but there's some really
> interesting DNS stuff going on in the Kubernetes world, for dynamic
> service discovery. But I get the impression they are using DNS for
> compatibility with existing software, not because they care about
> connecting their container cluster to a global namespace.
Yes, but it's terribly *IPv4* NAT44-everything-you-can centric.
It's nice that docker and kubernetes have made themselves IPAMs, but it turns
out that turning that off is actually rather difficult.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
