Section 8 - Acknowledgements: "We wish to thank Michael Sinatra, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Olafur Gudmundsson, Paul Hoffman and Evan Hunt for their imminent feedback." Paraphrasing one of my colleagues, is the part about "imminent feedback" a prediction, or a hint that we are supposed to give more feedback? :-) My most imminent feedback--right now--is that I think the language in Section 3 has come together really nicely and does a good job of informing operators of the trade-offs of using the different algorithms, and it provides good recommendations. I certainly support advancing it. michael On 2/13/19 11:29 AM, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG > (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Algorithm Implementation > Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-05.txt> as Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-02-27. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > The DNSSEC protocol makes use of various cryptographic algorithms in > order to provide authentication of DNS data and proof of non- > existence. To ensure interoperability between DNS resolvers and DNS > authoritative servers, it is necessary to specify a set of algorithm > implementation requirements and usage guidelines to ensure that there > is at least one algorithm that all implementations support. This > document defines the current algorithm implementation requirements > and usage guidance for DNSSEC. This document obsoletes [RFC6944]. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
