Hi Paul, At 03:48 PM 18-02-2019, Paul Wouters wrote:
See also: https://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/2019-February/010332.html It seems that we likely do not need to add Update: clauses for those entries in 6944.
Thanks for the quick response. By the way, the draft is well-written. The IESG might have a few comments about the references section.
Regards,S. Moonesamy