Ah yes. "imminent" was a reminder of their commitment to volunteer to give feedback :)
If we do another rev as a result of this call, I'll remove it. Otherwise, I'll leave a note with the RFC Editor to do so.
Paul
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:40 PM Michael Sinatra <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Section 8 - Acknowledgements:
"We wish to thank Michael Sinatra, Roland van Rijswijk-Deij, Olafur
Gudmundsson, Paul Hoffman and Evan Hunt for their imminent feedback."
Paraphrasing one of my colleagues, is the part about "imminent feedback"
a prediction, or a hint that we are supposed to give more feedback? :-)
My most imminent feedback--right now--is that I think the language in
Section 3 has come together really nicely and does a good job of
informing operators of the trade-offs of using the different algorithms,
and it provides good recommendations. I certainly support advancing it.
michael
On 2/13/19 11:29 AM, The IESG wrote:
>
> The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
> (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Algorithm Implementation
> Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC'
> <draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update-05.txt> as Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2019-02-27. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of
> the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> The DNSSEC protocol makes use of various cryptographic algorithms in
> order to provide authentication of DNS data and proof of non-
> existence. To ensure interoperability between DNS resolvers and DNS
> authoritative servers, it is necessary to specify a set of algorithm
> implementation requirements and usage guidelines to ensure that there
> is at least one algorithm that all implementations support. This
> document defines the current algorithm implementation requirements
> and usage guidance for DNSSEC. This document obsoletes [RFC6944].
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-algorithm-update/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
