| Robert, thanks for your review. I agree about the heartbeat requirements and said so in my No Objection ballot. Tiru, thanks for your response on the other point.
Alissa
Hi Robert,Please see inline-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 8:47 PM
To: gen-art@xxxxxxxx
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-requirements.all@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; dots@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18
This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD
before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Document: draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2019-02-13
IETF LC End Date: 2018-11-23
IESG Telechat date: 2019-02-21
Summary: Ready, but with a process issue for the shepherd and AD to consider.
This version addressed all of my comments on version -16. Thank you.
However, the diff shows that a large number of SHOULDs were changed to
MUSTs.
I'm guessing that was in response to a comment in the TSVART review of -16.
Yup.This large scale substitution makes me worry - are they really the right
adjustments? Has the group reviewed and agreed to these normative changes?
The WG has not identified any qualifying exceptional conditions for these requirements when the discussing the DOTS protocol and requirements drafts, hence I updated these requirements to use MUST.
As a nit, I'll note that the additional description of heartbeating creeps into
specifying protocol rather than requirements.
The additional text in SIG-004 is added to justify the reason for using "SHOULD".Cheers,-Tiru
_______________________________________________Gen-art mailing listGen-art@xxxxxxxxhttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
|
