Hi Tom, Thank again for your review comments below. We've uploaded version 04/-05 which attempts to address these comments. See inline [TS] for resolution. -----Original Message----- From: tom petch <ietfa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 at 12:13 PM To: Jan Lindblad <janl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tarek Saad <tsaad@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: "yang-doctors@xxxxxxxx" <yang-doctors@xxxxxxxx>, "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types.all@xxxxxxxx" <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types.all@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, "teas@xxxxxxxx" <teas@xxxxxxxx> Subject: [Teas] not a Yangdoctor review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-03 Tarek The YANG modules have lots of references - good - but they are not in the I-D references - not good. My list is 3272 4202 4328 4657 5817 6004 6205 6511 7139 7308 7551 7571 7579 7951 G.808 G.8031 G.8131 G.873.1 [TS]: thanks. I've added the missing references and they should show in the I-D references now. s.3.1 I would find more usable if the types were in an order I could recognise, such as alphabetical [TS]: OK, I tried an attempt to sort the typedefs alphabetically. import ietf-routing-types { prefix "rt-types"; reference "RFC6991: Common YANG Data Types"; perhaps RFC8294 is intended [TS]: corrected to RFC8294 " defined in ietf-network.yang, to help user to understand "" might benefit from a reference - is this draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo? [TS]: added reference RFC8345. /"Then index of the label/ "The index of the label / [TS]: fixed typo. container tiebreakers { description "The list of tiebreaker criterion to apply on an equally favored set of paths to pick best"; list tiebreaker { description "The list of tiebreaker criterion to apply on an equally favored set of paths to pick best"; One description is perhaps enough [TS]: removed/updated redundant description. uses path-objective-function_config; using _ is not wrong but is discouraged, mixing _ with - in a label more so [TS]: OK, we have moved away from using "_" in the naming. /This document registers a YANG module/ This document registers two YANG modules/ [TS]: fixed typo. name: ietf-te-types namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te- types prefix: ietf-te-types reference: RFC3209 name: ietf-te-packet-types namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-te-packet-types prefix: ietf-te- packet-types reference: RFC3209 Perhaps /3209/XXXX/ [TS]: fixed. Regards, Tarek Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jan Lindblad" <janl@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: <yang-doctors@xxxxxxxx>; <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types.all@xxxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; <teas@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 10:10 AM Subject: Re: [Teas] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types-03 (was -01) >