Re: [Tsv-art] [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Dec 4, 2018, at 8:11 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That works only for HBH options of type 00. Others require particular actions when not supported.


can you expand on this some?

Nobody deprecated the flags that require HBH options to be processed or dropped if not supported. 

And if there is a security risk to the control plane, it is using that place for slow path processing without properly limiting its use of shared resources. 

This idea that packets processed as intended are a security risk is like saying big packets are a security risk to small packets. It may be a bad design but it doesn’t mean such packets are inherently a security risk. 

Joe

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux