Hi Ben, On 2018-11-30 20:33, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:26:56PM -0500, Andrew G. Malis wrote: >> A recent change to the tools page html-ized versions of Internet Drafts now >> has them centered in the browser window. See, for example, >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip-01 >> >> However, other views of drafts continue to be left-justified in the browser >> window. See, for example: >> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip-01.txt and >> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-xu-mpls-sr-over-ip-01.html >> >> I corresponded with Henrik about this change, and he said that it was at a >> user's request, and my complaint is the first he's received. >> >> I myself much prefer the previous behavior, having all three views >> left-justified in the window. >> >> At the very least, all three views should be consistent. >> >> So this email is an attempt to find a consensus on how to display drafts in >> a browser window, left-justified or centered, and whether all of the views >> should be consistent. > > My small change: I was unpleasantly surprised by the change when it > happened, but am confident that I can adapt to either just fine, provided > that the copy/paste issues at [1] get addressed somehow. I sent a reply to you regarding this on 2018-11-16 22:57 CET, asking you to try out a tentative solution. I understand from what you write below that it probably didn't reach you, either. In that message I pointed at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levkowetz-xml2rfc-v3-implementation-notes-05 and asked you to check whether it worked for you, but the change I introduced to address the copy/paste issue should be live for any recently htmlized documents by now. > And I second Adrian's thanks to Henrik and the team for all they do! Thanks :-) > -Ben > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/EF5z55NuS4-MNr9ErYPhDv03Ml4 > > I suppose I should have followed up on why Henrik's reply never actually > made it to my INBOX, but (1) it's surely too late for logs to still be > around, and (2) I'm more inclined to blame MIT's systems than the IETF's > anyway. (For Henrik's benefit, I'm using both Chrome and Firefox on > linux.) Ok. I'll re-send my latest and check my logs, to see how MIT answers my server (also linux). Best regards, Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
