this is a separate issue about the iasa2 proposed updates come on - you update an RFC without including a section that says what changes you are making??? are you purposely trying to make it harder for IETF participants to understand what’s going on? every RFC that updates another RFC needs (MUST?) have a section that tells the reader what has changed - this is vital for any technical speck so the implementor knows what they have to change in their implementation but its also very important in process documents so participants can understand if they need to change how they do things so, be nice to the participants and admit (in writing) what changes you are proposing Scott
