In addition it spawning a different browser for each search.
Inefficient implementation that can crash thin clients.
I have downloaded and experimented Highlight to Search Google chrome
extension
on the text i Created http://www.pradeepkumarxplorer.com/YogaSequence.txt.
Its not really the same as httpi
It does search in one application google.com. What if Yahoo provides
better search result.
There's no way for User profiling. I am someone being a man prefering to see
only woman models in youtube or images quoting as an example. I am
saying its difficult for an ordinary user as opposed to an engineer
to know about extensions and install. Its against the guideline of
keeping clients thin as possible. As a Usability evaluator, i would
say instead of one click, its now two to three clicks and it does
not do the choosing for me.Computer / WWW can chose first and then
allow WWW user to ReSearch if needed.I am saying software used by
Highlight to search should be reused in httpi code in server side if
its the correct thing to do but it uses only google.Just typing
httpi should give WWW user best of all extensions available and
more.I would say enable intelligent browsing menu in Browser should
lead to URL being prefixed by httpi or the user can type httpi. What
you are saying is work is already 90 percent done
but scattered in fez dozen software that should be consolidated into
one place
good principles of software engineering.
Pluggable intelligent profiles could be used in server side in httpi://
Is anyone aware of any AI mailing list that's appropriate that can
be included for their opinion?
Pradeep Kumar Xplorer
