(greetings from a campsite in Northern Ontario...)
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> in the IASA. It appears that procedures were not always written down
> as completely as one might like, and the apparent gaps have had to be
> filled in from people's recollections.
Could we have a list of the things that were filled in?
Maybe the community will notice that the recollection was inaccurate?
> is not available). Accordingly, the IAOC closed the Tools Management
> Committee. At the same meeting, the IAOC closed the Sponsorship
How will the tools work be supervised, and reported to the community?
> https://iaoc.ietf.org/venue-selection.html. An important part of that
> has been the replacement of the former Meetings Committee with a new
> Venue Review Committee. The new committee is intended to be quite
> limited in its scope, because its primary task is to evaluate staff
> recommendations for conformance with the MTGVENUE criteria. This is
> not an algorithm, of course, so some judgement will be required. But
> the process is intended to be lightweight and transparent to the
> community. We're continuing to refine procedures for this, and you
> should expect to see more announcements over time.
Will the reviews be public? In particular, will reasons for rejecting sites
be public? I don't think the previous evaluation was public, but maybe I
just never looked in the right place.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
