Re: agenda for the RFC++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Brian,

if you are not more concrete with your comments, it will be difficult
for us to address them ;-) Please, note that slide 9 lists what has been
done while slide 10 lists what it is allowed. So, for example, those
slides show that while the Independent Stream is not supposed to publish
Proposed Standards, it was somehow done in the past.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 16/07/2018 4:29 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> slide 9, Independent column, there are 2 erroneous X's
> 
> Regards
>    Brian
> 
> 
> 
> On 17/07/2018 07:09, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>> Hi Loa,
>>
>> the chair slides are available at (in her email, Heather also sent links
>> to the mailing list archives and to the original BoF proposal):
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/slides-102-rfcplusplus-slides-00
>>
>> You can find the questions there. As you can see, they are a few very
>> generic questions intended to explore the problem space because, so far,
>> the discussions on the mailing list have not converged at all. We have
>> not seen any consensus so far around whether or not there is a problem
>> and, if so, whether or not it is a problem worth solving.
>>
>> There have been discussions about the solution space as well, but we
>> believe we need to discuss the problem space a bit better before jumping
>> into designing and discussing concrete solutions.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>>
>> On 16/07/2018 1:57 PM, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> With an agenda like this
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/materials/agenda-102-rfcplusplus-00
>>>
>>>
>>> How am I supposed to prepared the the bof?
>>>
>>> /Loa
>>
>>
> 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux