Le 13/06/2018 à 20:02, Warren Kumari a écrit :
I'm assuming you tried it with the docName attribute as
"draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-24" ?
That is not the full draft name.
The full draft name is draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-24.txt
Right?
Alex
W
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:44 PM Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I have just tried again: if I submit just the xml then the web page
complains in red about title and draft name. If I submit both the xml
and the txt then it accepts it.
The complain in red is this:
> Could not extract a valid draft revision from the upload. To fix this
> in a text upload, please make sure that the full draft name including
> revision number appears centered on its own line below the document
> title on the first page. In an xml upload, please make sure that the
> top-level <rfc/> element has a docName attribute which provides the
> full draft name including revision number.
This is the xml excerpt that may cause issue?:
> <rfc category="std"
> docName="draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-24.txt"
> ipr="trust200902">
Attached the full xml file for what it's worth.
Alex
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
---maf
