Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    > If Friday is a non-working day, we may end up in a situation where
    > people stop showing up at the late Thursday sessions, and/or request
    > their WGs not to be scheduled on late Thursday…

I disagree.  It's not a slippery slope.
Yes, there will be a few, there are some already who do that.

The number of people who can get home faster by leaving the conference space
at 3 or 4pm for a 5pm-ish flight home is small.  Yes, that's when my
preferred flight home to Canada is from Seoul or Tokyo is, but I could have
taken a later flight with a US routing.  That's the only kind of location where
I think it would matter.  There are either no flights, or there are
additional flights later in the evening.

I think that this is even smaller still now that we are seldom in the US.
Maybe some Europeans and Asians can comment on feasbility of returning early evening
Thursday vs late Thursday, or having to stay to Friday anyway.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux