Re: [tram] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-tram-stunbis-16

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you.  See inline.

On 05/03/2018 06:32 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Because we believe that this is a problem that will become more and
>> more frequent, we decided to fix it, at least for new implementations.
>>
>> Please have a look at -17 and let us know what you think of it.
> 
> It looks like you've handled the problem of a NAT that changes the
> address family of the request as well as can be done.
> 
> You've clarified the question of how the security feature bits are
> assigned, although I note that -16 and -17 assign the bits differently
> than versions -7 through -15 do.
> 
> That completes all of the significant issues from my review of -16.
> 
> And there are some nits:
> 
> 6.2.1.  Sending over UDP or DTLS-over-UDP
> 
>    SHOULD be greater or equal than 500 ms.
> 
> s/equal than/equal to/.

Applied.

> 
> 6.2.3.  Sending over TLS-over-TCP or DTLS-over-UDP
> 
>    To do that, it follows the
>    identification procedures defined in [RFC6125], with a certificate
>    containing an identifier of type DNS-ID or CN-ID, eventually with
>    wildcards, but not of type SRV-ID or URI-ID.
> 
> The meaning of "eventually" here is not clear.

Rephrased as:

   [...]
   containing an identifier of type DNS-ID or CN-ID, eventually with a
   wildcard character as leftmost label, but not of type SRV-ID or URI-
   [...]

> 
> 14.  STUN Attributes
> 
>    The
>    padding bits MUST be set to zero on sending and must be ignored by
>    the receiver.
> 
> I assume the latter "must" is supposed to be "MUST".

Fixed.

> 
> 14.13.  UNKNOWN-ATTRIBUTES
> 
>    Note:  In [RFC3489], this field was padded to 32 by duplicating the
>       last attribute.  In this version of the specification, thPetriNet
>       m --> PetriNet m --> e normal padding rules for attributes are
>       used instead.
> 
> I assume that "thPetriNet m --> PetriNet m --> e" is intended to be
> "the".

Fixed.

> 
> Appendix C.  Release notes
> 
> Section C.8 has the same contents as section C.9, but section C.9 has
> the same title as section C.10.  (Although section C will be removed
> before publication, so it's not important.)

Fixed.

-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux