On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 4:06 PM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <7FEC3265-C38B-4BB0-91C4-4F6990D00DA4@xxxxxxxxx > you write:
>I would sure rather the justification were published as an RFC so people can find the reasons in the future
It's in RFC 6686, in the unlikely event that someone who cares didn't
already know the answer.
And apparently the process for "moving to historic" does not involve an RFC per se. There is a separate document covering the reason for the deprecation.
--Kurt
