Suresh: > > Thanks for your comments. Please find responses inline. > >> On Apr 17, 2018, at 7:47 PM, Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Thanks for putting this document together. I have two minor comments. >> >> First, in Section 2 the document says: >> >> Please note that the boundaries between those regions has been >> purposefully left undefined per WG consensus. >> >> As a BCP, I think it would be more valuable to simply say: >> >> The boundaries between regions is purposefully left ambiguous. > > Sounds good. Will make this change. > >> >> >> Second, at the end of Section 2, the document says: >> >> How often we intend to do such meetings in the future should also be >> an open topic for discussion within the community. >> >> I think the document should nail down who makes this decision. I suggest: >> >> The timing and frequency of such exploratory meetings in the future >> is left to the IETF Chair, after discussion with the IESG and the >> community. > > Sounds good. Does this text work? > > "The timing and frequency of such exploratory meetings in the future will be based on IETF consensus as determined by the IETF chair” Works for me. Russ
