In article <23d1e398-887d-4c7c-2c9d-da9fad200415@xxxxxxxxx> you write: >I don't see evidence sufficient to warrant a change to >something else right now. In saying that I regard the >1-1-1 scheme as being somewhat aspirational in practice, >and that's ok. At this point, we need to think about how to figure out what the rotation should be, maybe 1-1-1, maybe something else. That will require a combination of data we have and a lot of data we haven't. It would be really nice if there were some way to find people who didn't come to a meeting but would have if it were somewhere else, but I don't know how to do it. Perhaps some sort of polling of past meeting attendee lists might provide useful data. There's the related issue that meetings in some places are a lot more expensive than in others. For example, there are places that look like they'd be great except that the circuits we need for the conference network we want would cost vastly more than they do elsewhere. R's, John
