On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 02:43:38PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
> Ben:
>
> >> Why are we having a second Last Call on this document?
> >>
> >> The first Last Call began on 16 Feb 2018 and ended on 16 Mar 2018.
> >
> > II[UR]C, the process for moving things to historic requires a
> > separate status-change document that goes out for 4-week IETF LC
> > alongside the document effecting the status change. I don't think
> > the status-change document existed in last month's last call.
>
> Indeed it did. I do not know whether the Last Call properly included it, bu the history tab clearly shows that the status change document was created on 10 Feb 2018.
>
> See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-suiteb-to- <https://datatracker.ietf.org/historic/history/ doc/status-change-suiteb-to- >historic/history/
I was just looking at
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/ ,current/maillist.html
which does *not* show an IETF Last Call being issued for
"Reclassification of Suite B Documents to Historic Status" (the
status change document) until today. So that seems to be the part
that was missed last time.
This is my assessment as well. I didn't request this, but looks like the secretariat caught the error!
-Ekr
-Ben
