Why are we having a second Last Call on this document? The first Last Call began on 16 Feb 2018 and ended on 16 Mar 2018. Russ > On Mar 27, 2018, at 11:14 AM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the > following document: - 'Reclassification of Suite B Documents to Historic > Status' > <draft-housley-suite-b-to-historic-04.txt> as Informational RFC > > The Last Call for the document draft-housley-suite-b-to-historic is related to > the status change document, also in Last Call, for status-change-suiteb-to-historic. > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2018-04-24. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of > the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > > This document reclassifies the RFCs related to the U.S. National > Security Agency (NSA) Suite B cryptographic algorithms as Historic, > and it discusses the reasons for doing so. This document moves seven > informational RFCs to Historic Status: RFC 5759, RFC 6239, RFC 6318, > RFC 6379, RFC 6380, RFC 6403, and RFC 6460. In addition, this > document moves three obsolete informational RFCs to Historic Status: > RFC 4869, RFC 5008, and RFC 5430. > > > > > The file can be obtained via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-suite-b-to-historic/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-housley-suite-b-to-historic/ballot/ > > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. > > > >
