> On 9 Feb 2018, at 1:50 am, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > How this is not a problem!!! > > Think about newcomers to the Internet, they will be assigned IPv6 only, how other IPv4 only communicate with them?!! > > Khaled They will take the step required to make themselves dual stacked. If your company doesn’t take the steps to enable IPv6 for you complain to your management. There is NOTHING the IETF can do that is preventing them enabling IPv6. > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Individual Draft Submissions. > From: Christopher Morrow > To: Khaled Omar > CC: Warren Kumari ,ietf > > > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > With IPv10 you will be able to access IPv6 only from IPv4 only hosts, and with the DNS, as described on the draft, you can have AAAA record as a reply to hostname resolution from an IPv4 only host then the communication can take place. > > > sorry, last time... this isn't a problem in the real world. > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Individual Draft Submissions. > From: Christopher Morrow > To: Khaled Omar > CC: Warren Kumari ,ietf > > > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Google IPv6 only websites and you will not be able to browse any, here is an example http://ipv6.cybernode.com/list-of-ipv6-only-sites > > > maybe warren's point (and pretty much everyone else's actually) is that accessing a website takes more than just compatible IP protocol numbers. > ipv6.google.com has no A record, only an AAAA record in DNS... your ipv4 host will never lookup a AAAA because it's ipv4 not ipv6. > > this is working as intended. > > Khaled > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Individual Draft Submissions. > From: Warren Kumari > To: Khaled Omar > CC: Ted Lemon ,ietf > > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Khaled Omar wrote: > > Try to access (browse) an IPv6-only website for example and you will not be > > able if you have an IPv4-only address. > > Sure, please provide a list of IPv6 only websites (not simply test > ones) and I'll be happy to give it a try from my IPv4 only hotel room. > > W > > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: Re: Individual Draft Submissions. > > From: Ted Lemon > > To: Khaled Omar > > CC: Christopher Morrow ,ietf > > > > > > On Feb 7, 2018, at 11:51 PM, Khaled Omar > > wrote: > > > > For IPv4 only hosts. > > > > > > Not for what: for whom? Who has this problem? E.g., from your personal > > perspective, what hosts have you been unable to connect to because you only > > have IPv4 at home or at work? > > > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair > of pants. > ---maf > > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx