Re: Individual Draft Submissions.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It won’t be a IPv4 only host.  It will be a IPv10 host.

Sorry your draft doesn’t do what you think it does.

Mark

> On 9 Feb 2018, at 1:18 am, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> With IPv10 you will be able to access IPv6 only from IPv4 only hosts, and with the DNS, as described on the draft, you can have AAAA record as a reply to hostname resolution from an IPv4 only host then the communication can take place.
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Individual Draft Submissions.
> From: Christopher Morrow 
> To: Khaled Omar 
> CC: Warren Kumari ,ietf 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:07 AM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Google IPv6 only websites and you will not be able to browse any, here is an example http://ipv6.cybernode.com/list-of-ipv6-only-sites
> 
> 
> maybe warren's point (and pretty much everyone else's actually)  is that accessing a website takes more than just compatible IP protocol numbers.
> ipv6.google.com has no A record, only an AAAA record in DNS... your ipv4 host will never lookup a AAAA because it's ipv4 not ipv6.
> 
> this is working as intended.
>  
> Khaled
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Individual Draft Submissions.
> From: Warren Kumari 
> To: Khaled Omar 
> CC: Ted Lemon ,ietf 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 8:26 AM, Khaled Omar wrote:
> > Try to access (browse) an IPv6-only website for example and you will not be
> > able if you have an IPv4-only address.
> 
> Sure, please provide a list of IPv6 only websites (not simply test
> ones) and I'll be happy to give it a try from my IPv4 only hotel room.
> 
> W
> 
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: Individual Draft Submissions.
> > From: Ted Lemon
> > To: Khaled Omar
> > CC: Christopher Morrow ,ietf
> >
> >
> > On Feb 7, 2018, at 11:51 PM, Khaled Omar 
> > wrote:
> >
> > For IPv4 only hosts.
> >
> >
> > Not for what: for whom? Who has this problem? E.g., from your personal
> > perspective, what hosts have you been unable to connect to because you only
> > have IPv4 at home or at work?
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
> ---maf
> 

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]