Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:12:43 +1000
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5E1A09B2-B139-417F-8D21-29C1FC9049EB@frobbit.se>
References: <20170923151547.7163.qmail@ary.lan> <5E1A09B2-B139-417F-8D21-29C1FC9049EB@frobbit.se>

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can not whoever develops Javascript develop some correct libraries for usage of domain names?

No.  See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/0ZmU7MmN_ADb_pseJnPfjkyFjGQ

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Melinda Shore

References:
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: John Levine
- Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
  - From: Patrik Fältström

Prev by Date: Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
Next by Date: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Previous by thread: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Next by thread: Re: [Doh] what is this good for, WG Review: DNS Over HTTPS (doh)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]