Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 18, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do we? Can you cite something that makes this claim under color of consensus?

Also, consider what it takes to make catting a UTF-8 file work in a terminal program.   ISTM that the only way for it to not spew garbage characters is for the terminal program to understand UTF-8 without requiring a BOM.   I suppose you could make the terminal program elide the BOM wherever it's encountered in the output stream (on a character boundary), but this isn't how BOMs are supposed to work.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]