On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:17 AM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 9/18/17 12:29 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> In the many discussions leading up to the -00 wording for the charter (which became much longer in IESG discussion) > > $ wc charter-ietf-doh-00-00.txt > 19 127 831 charter-ietf-doh-00-00.txt > > $ wc charter-ietf-doh-00-06.txt > 19 168 1124 charter-ietf-doh-00-06.txt > > I'm not sure a 41-word expansion really qualifies as "much longer," especially given that 53 of those words are new text requiring coordination with other WGs that have a vested interest in this topic. Good point. > This conversation might be more productive if we hedge away from hyperbole. Indeed, and I apologize for injecting that last bit of hyperbole here. FWIW, it is my intention to be a good document editor and follow WG consensus on what needs to be added as the eventual WG discussion evolves. --Paul Hoffman