> On 16 Sep 2017, at 6:53 am, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You're making an assumption that I don't think is established, that the requests using HTTPS for DNS are not distinguishable from other resources. If they were keyed by something like dnsh://authority/query-target?RR (to pick on poor old RFC 4501 again), they would be in JavaScript *even if they were not on the wire*. As before, I read the charter as saying that this protocol will use HTTP in the sense of <https://mnot.github.io/I-D/bcp56bis/#used> -- i.e., defining a new URI scheme is out of scope. If that's not clear, it should be made explicit. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/