Tom,
The revised Note Well references 8179, not 8127. See https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well.html , which is where I lifted the Note Well text for my chairs slides.
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 4:33 AM, tom p. <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As the minutes trickle out for IETF99, I see repeated references to a
revised Notewell, one of which asks us to read RFC8127.
Looking at the RFC Editor's FTP site, I find a gap between RFC8126 and
RFC8128.
Looking at the RFCINDEX thereon, I see a similar gap.
Searching the announcement list for RFC 8127, I get no matches.
Clearly the WG Chairs have been given a briefing but is this something
that those of us who only contribute via e-mail should be aware of? If
so, how? I cannot recall seeing anything on WG lists about this, until
I started reading the minutes, since January 2016.
Tom Petch