In the Chicago (IETF 98), I’ve been allocated a /64 so I can run my own CLAT in my laptop (I was doing it either by means of a VM with OpenWRT or a VM with Ubuntu and Jool).
It was working perfectly.
Of course, I’ve tried that in other scenarios, including some thousands of CPEs in customer networks.
Regards,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> en nombre de Philip Homburg <pch-ietf-6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Responder a: <pch-ietf-6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fecha: miércoles, 2 de agosto de 2017, 10:45
Para: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
CC: "jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jordi.palet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Asunto: Incremental Deployment of CLAT on the router for IETF Meetings
>I'm talking about when you have CLAT in the router.
Maybe we can have all discussion about CLAT on the router under this
subject?
Is there any experience with this? Did previous IETF meetings have an
experimental SSID with this setup?
I'm certainly not opposed to having the router do some sort of tunneling.
Whether it is CLAT+NAT64 or MAP-E, MAP-T. DS-Lite or what have you.
As long it provides hosts with the illusion of CGN IPv4-NAT then that's
probably the best you can expect in most places.
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.