Re: RESENDING - Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

[Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 30, 2017, at 7:11 PM, John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Forcing the whole conference to participate would not.

I would just like to point out that nobody here has proposed forcing the whole conference to participate.   What the draft proposes is changing the _default_, not making non-NAT64 IPv4 service unavailable.

On Jul 30, 2017, at 11:55 PM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:

someone else suggested that we turn off all other ssids for the 6man and

v6ops wg meetings.  there would be leakage, of course.  and it's a pita
(we *really* do not like to make changes during the week).  perhaps the
chairs could strongly encourage those in the wg meetings to use either
v6only or nat64.

I don't see the point.   We already know that NAT64 mostly works, and we know when it breaks, and why.   The only really interesting question is how many people this breakage affects, and what specific apps break.

On Jul 30, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Bill Fenner <fenner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On the other hand, the corporate VPN I use publishes a support matrix on their public web site, and specifically says that IPv6 is not supported. I don't think they're embarrassed about it.

Would you be willing to share with us the name of the vendor?