On 03/31/2017 04:11 PM, Robert Raszuk wrote: > I do not understand how 2460bis makes it "easier" if proposed change to > the text directly tries to prohibit what is described in a document > already long time back accepted as a 6man working group draft. This is incorrect. For instance, the condition to accepting such I-D as a wg items was indeed that EH insertion was removed, and that encapsulation be used instead. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492