Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/02/2017 14:12, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:02 PM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> excuse?  this is why we have ietf last call.
> 
> No, we do not have IETF last call so that people who participated in the working group discussion can re-litigate the points they lost on in the working group discussion.

I was fairly specific when I raised the issue at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/myyPO9b4dYfYeGQrdPjTNzIHArY

>> I do not dispute that this sentence reached WG consensus. However, I want
>> to ask if it has IETF consensus.

If people who were not involved in the 6man debate have opinions, it would
be useful to hear from them. I agree that there is no point in the same
people repeating the same arguments.

     Brian




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]