> are we re-spinning the debate on a WG-agreed text ? > > <tp> > > Yes, and I am sure that that is exactly what is intended. Then let's encourage people outside of 6man, with other points of view, and other arguments to come forward. A re-run of the discussions already had in 6man with the same arguments and the same participants doesn't seem useful. For a brief (sic) overview take a look at 672 messages already on the topic: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=header+insertion&f_list=ipv6 O.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP