Re: IPv10 (Temp. name IPmix) (draft-omar-ipv10-00.txt).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/12/2016 09:47, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 30 Dec 2016, at 21:08, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> Please be more specific. What doesn't work that you want to work? And which of
>> those things will not be addressed by homenet?
> 
> Is SLAAC+NDP, DHCPv6+NDP or DHCPv6-PD to be used for prefix allocation?
> 
> Or something else?
> 
> I am pretty sure Homenet is working on this.

Yes. Including running code, to my understanding**. HNCP (RFC7788) does prefix
allocation and assumes DHCPv6-PD for prefix distribution. (We also support
DHCPv6-PD in draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management, but that is ongoing work.)

> But that is exactly my point when I say that IPv6 must be *really* ready the day when people will ask for it.
> 
> And when I say we should use the fact we do have some time to refine the specifications, implementations and deployment so that we are ready when CPEs start to really implement IPv6 in whatever way Homenet is specifying.

For homenets that need subnets, of course. I'm not panicking, however: when it's ready,
it will be used. There's no flag day.

    Brian

** http://toreanderson.github.io/2015/10/11/making-a-homenet-router-out-of-openwrt.html





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]