> This implies NAT64 but I do not see that be closer in evolution than > other alternatives. the ietf meeting noc has been asked to push nat64/dns64 a bit harder. we are trying to get beefier and redundant a10s. if so, we'll ask folk to seriously exercise it, just to get some experience, document what works and what does not, etc. > I see IPv6 deployment: > a. At some cellphone providers. and massive cgn :( > I am not talking about Enterprise. That is ready. > > You say in 7381: > > > Last but not least, one of the most important design choices to make > > while deploying IPv6 on the internal network is whether to use SLAAC > > [RFC4862], the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) > > [RFC3315], or a combination thereof. > > To be blunt, as long as there is a choice, we will not see large deployment. there is no choice. in all but greenfield, dhcp rules. and, in the big enterprises, exit control is big. randy