Re: IPv10.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Latif,

On 12/11/2016 20:17, Latif LADID [IPv6-based Internet] wrote:
> Jon Postel will swizel in his grave if v10 is not assigned by IANA first.
> Let's not confuse the market. A working group at ETSI has been formed 6
> months ago called NGP ( Next Gereation Protocols) lashing at v4 and v6 to
> invent a new one.  

How incredibly foolish of them.

   Brian

> Also the ITU will jump on this one to occupy the v10
> space :-)
> 
> Latif
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: 12 November 2016 02:43
> To: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; ipv6@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: IPv10.
> 
> On 12/11/2016 14:15, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Right now it seems that you have got a solution proposal for a 
>>> problem, that is IMHO not very clearly described.
>>
>> how about ipv4 and ipv6 are incompatible on the wire and this has 
>> created a multi-decade ipv6 charlie foxtrot?
> 
> Yes, I suggest mentioning that to Vint, Bob and a few others in 1977, so
> that they can design IPv4 with extensible addresses. People in
> 2016 will be grateful.
> 
>    Brian
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@xxxxxxxx
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]