Re: IPv10.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPv10.
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:15:21 +0900
Cc: "ipv6@xxxxxxxx" <ipv6@xxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <37c3bc17-daa1-cac0-3848-5eb97350b87c@kit.edu>
References: <HE1PR04MB1449514D421EAC698335EE99BDBB0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <37c3bc17-daa1-cac0-3848-5eb97350b87c@kit.edu>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

> Right now it seems that you have got a solution proposal
> for a problem, that is IMHO not very clearly described.

how about ipv4 and ipv6 are incompatible on the wire and this
has created a multi-decade ipv6 charlie foxtrot?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv10.
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

References:
- IPv10.
  - From: Khaled Omar
- Re: IPv10.
  - From: Bless, Roland (TM)

Prev by Date: Re: IPv10.
Next by Date: NomCom Cal for Feedback and Office Hours: IETF 97
Previous by thread: Re: IPv10.
Next by thread: Re: IPv10.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]