Hi Khaled, > I wish I’m not bothering you by my e-mails, but all what I’m asking you > is to find a free time on your calendars so we can discuss, suggest, and > participate in making the final version of the IPv10 draft and start > experimenting its work, and once it will work efficiently and we find > that it will bring a great value to the Internet, it can be standardized > by the IETF. Most of the time :-) the IETF works problem oriented. Right now it seems that you have got a solution proposal for a problem, that is IMHO not very clearly described. I have not understood the point of your solution either, it looks like having IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Addresses in an IPv6 header. Such solutions were considered as not being useful long time ago. Suggestion: - Check the material for newcomers to the IETF https://www.ietf.org/newcomers.html - Describe the problem that you want to solve in an individual Internet-Draft (I-D) https://www.ietf.org/id-info/ along with a statement why existing technologies do not solve it sufficiently, probably also give a sketch of your solution. The I-D is accessible by everyone from a central repository. - You can then solicit discussion of the I-D on certain mailing lists that are related to the topic. Coming back to your proposal, the statement "IPv10 allows hosts from two IP versions to be able to communicate, and this can be accomplished by having an IPv10 packet containing a mixture of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in the same IP packet header." is contradictory in itself since neither IPv4-_only_ nor IPv6-only_ hosts will understand your "new" IPv10 format by definition. Best regards, Roland